Ne vs Chesapeake Dbq - 884 Words

Indeed, New England and the Chesapeake regions both had settlers of English descent; by the 1700s the developments of these sodalities had sculptured them into two distinct societies. The premier reason for the differentiation of the evolvement was primarily due to the motives for the foundations of these regions. The Virginia Company of London received a charter from King James I of England to establish Jamestown in 1607 in the New World as a profit-making venture. Like most joint stock companies, the Virginia Company was designed to last for a few years dedicated to the proposition that all stockholders should receive dividends adequate for their investments. Conversely, New Englands motives for its foundation arose for religious†¦show more content†¦became a royal colony directly under his control. In contrast, The New Englanders took political interests in account in they way from England when they prepared the Mayflower Compact. The pact eventually led to the patriarch al society assembling to make their own laws in open-discussions in town meetings and general court. Unlike, the Chesapeake, the New Englanders were fortunate to have leaders like William Bradford to emerge as Governor and enforce Gods biblical laws and Christian values to make the theocratic government successful. Lastly the developments of the communities themselves contrasted greatly. In the Chesapeake region expansion of the settlement was somewhat random and was usually undertaken by lone tidewater planters on their own imitative, but the New England society grew in a more orderly fashion. New towns emerged and the distribution of land was under the steady authority of proprietors. New Englanders followed their benevolent Christian ways and shared fields to prevent a wide gap in the social structure. Social reciprocity allowed mutual interchanges of favors and privileges between neighbors keep the settlers content with their way of life. Differing from the New Englander, the Ch esapeake community had a wide gap in social classes. There was an accumulating mass of poor men who grew